JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foster, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lomax, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Foster, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lomax, P.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 157, Issue 1, 185-195, 1967
Copyright © 1967 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


A COMPARISON OF THE PHARMACOLOGIC EFFECTS OF MORPHINE AND N-METHYL MORPHINE

R. S. Foster 1, D. J. Jenden 1, and Peter Lomax 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine and the Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California

The pharmacologic effects of N-methyl morphine are quite different from those produced by morphine when the drugs are administered systemically. The only obvious effect noted with the quaternary derivative is neuromuscular paralysis, and death may result from respiratory failure. Further investigation of the drugs revealed that both lead to depression of intestinal motility when given intravenously. Analgesia and hypothermia do not appear following systemic injection of N-methyl morphine in doses that produce marked effects in the case of morphine. Injection of either drug into the thermoregulatory centers of the rat leads to a fall in core temperature and both can produce analgesia when injected directly into the region of the periventricular gray matter. When compared in their actions on peripheral structures, qualitatively similar effects were noted on the superior cervical ganglion of the cat and the isolated guinea-pig ileum in blocking the response to muscarinic drugs and coaxial electrical stimulation respectively. In most instances the N-methyl compound is somewhat less active than morphine. It is concluded that the modification of the morphine molecule does not necessarily destroy its pharmacologic actions once it has access to its receptor sites but the profound differences reported previously are due mainly to the inability of the charged N-methyl molecule to enter the central nervous system.

Submitted on December 21, 1966
Accepted on February 16, 1967




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
D. J. Mayer, T. L. Wolfle, H. Akil, B. Carder, and J. C. Liebeskind
Analgesia from Electrical Stimulation in the Brainstem of the Rat
Science, December 24, 1971; 174(4016): 1351 - 1354.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1967 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.