JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bito, L. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Hyndman, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bito, L. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Hyndman, J.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 157, Issue 1, 159-169, 1967
Copyright © 1967 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


ANTIPARASYMPATHOMIMETIC EFFECTS OF CHOLINESTERASE INHIBITOR TREATMENT

Laszlo Z. Bito 1, Kelly Hyslop 1, and John Hyndman 1

1 Department of Ophthalmology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York

Alterations in the pharmacologic properties of the iris of the cholinesterase inhibitor-treated eyes of the dog and rabbit have been investigated. One eye of each animal was treated with the cholinesterase inhibitor—in most cases, echothiophate iodide—three times daily for 10 to 18 days. After a few days of treatment the miotic (i.e., cholinergic) effectiveness of echothiophate gradually decreased until by the 5th day of treatment, it had virtually no miotic effect. These echothiophate-pretreated eyes also became refractory to the cholinergic effects of topically applied carbachol. Pilocarpine had a mydriatic rather than a miotic action on pretreated dog eyes. Cholinergic response could not be obtained in the echothiophate-pretreated rabbit eye even after intravitreal injection of 2000 times the normally effective dose of carbachol. In spite of these changes in its pharmacologic properties, the iris of the pretreated eye exhibited normal or, in the case of the dog, hyperactive physiologic responses to light. Atropine abolished these responses. These observations are discussed in the light of mechanisms known to control normal movements of the mammalian iris.

Submitted on December 2, 1966
Accepted on January 25, 1967







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1967 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.