JPET Celsis microsomes equal better data

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Albuquerque, E. X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Albuquerque, E. X.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 156, Issue 3, 573-584, 1967
Copyright © 1967 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


DIFFERENCES IN THE TUBOCURARINE ANTAGONISM OF THE ACTIVATION OF MUSCLE SPINDLE AFFERENTS BY SUCCINYLCHOLINE, ACETYLCHOLINE AND NICOTINE

Cedric M. Smith 1 and Edson X. Albuquerque 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

Oscillographic recordings of the activity of group Ia and II afferent fibers from deefferented muscle spindles in the triceps surae muscle group were carried out in acutely spinalized cats. Smaller doses of i.v. administered tubocurarine (TC) were required to abolish extrafusal neuromuscular transmission than to abolish transmission from fusimotor nerve fibers to intrafusal muscle fibers. After the administration of sufficient TC to abolish fusimotor neuromuscular transmission the stimulation of the group Ia or II afferent discharge induced by succinylcholine (SCh) or nicotine was reduced but not abolished, whereas the stimulation by acetylcholine (ACh) was abolished. It is concluded that SCh and nicotine act, at least in part, postsynaptically on the intrafusal muscle fibers whereas the action of ACh could be largely confined to the presynaptic endings on intrafusal fibers. However, some of these differences between the actions of ACh and of the other agents could be interpreted as due to variations in degree of direct antagonism of TC.

Submitted on June 22, 1966
Accepted on January 16, 1967







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1967 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.