JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eade, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lasagna, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eade, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lasagna, L.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 155, Issue 2, 301-308, 1967
Copyright © 1967 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


A COMPARISON OF ACETOPHENETIDIN AND ACETAMINOPHEN. II. SUBJECTIVE EFFECTS IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS

Norman R. Eade 1 and Louis Lasagna 1

1 Departments of Medicine (Division of Clinical Pharmacology) and of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

The subjective effects of acetophenetidin, acetaminophen and acetylsalicylic acid were studied in 20 healthy male volunteers, aged 21 to 27 years. Acetophenetidin, acetaminophen and acetylsalicylic acid were given orally at a dosage level of 2 g/70 kg of b.wt. d-Amphetamine (15 mg/70 kg) and sodium pentobarbital (150 mg/70 kg) were included to determine the ability of the questionnaires employed to assess the expected spectrum of response. Evaluation was by two self-scoring questionnaires covering subjective and side effects respectively. The status of each subject was determined before drug and at 1, 2 and 3 hr thereafter. The subjective effects were grouped into three categories, mood, energy and mentation, with four separate statements being used to measure the magnitude and nature of the drug effect. The data were analyzed by the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test for correlated scores. Acetophenetidin depressed mood, energy and mentation. It tended to be scored as a drug with a striking effect, as one the subjects would not like to repeat and as a drug that would help them sleep. Acetaminophen and acetylsalicylic acid did not differ significantly from placebo. Acetophenetidin also produced more side effects than acetaminophen, although fewer than d-amphetamine and pentobarbital. The effects seen after acetophenetidin do not support the allegation that this drug increases efficiency by an amphetamine-like activity.

Submitted on June 2, 1966
Accepted on August 5, 1966







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1967 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.