JPET Celsis microsomes equal better data

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nastuk, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Poppers, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nastuk, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Poppers, P. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*TUBOCURARINE
*VITAMIN B1
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 154, Issue 3, 441-448, 1966
Copyright © 1966 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


THE EFFECT OF A THIAMINE ANALOG ON NEUROMUSCULAR TRANSMISSION

W. L. Nastuk 1 and P. J. Poppers 1

1 Department of Physiology and Department of Anesthesiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York

The action of a thiamine analog, 3(4-amino-2-methyl pyrimidyl-5-methyl)-thiazolium bromide hydrobromide (AMPMT) on neuromuscular transmission has been studied on frog sciatic nerve-sartorius muscle preparations in vitro. Multifiber and single fiber techniques have been employed. AMPMT (10 x 10-4 M) in 30 min depressed the tension output of indirectly stimulated muscle to 40% of the control value. The depression was not preceded by potentiation. AMPMT (5 x 10-4 M) caused no significant depolarization of the muscle postjunctional membrane. It blocked neuromuscular transmission in 17 of 25 junctions. At blocked junctions end-plate potentials (e.p.p.'s) of low amplitude (average, 17.4 ± 1.8 mV) were recorded. The time course of these e.p.p.'s was not prolonged. At junctions in which transmission was not blocked, the rate of rise of the e.p.p. was significantly reduced. The critical membrane potential (at which level propagated action potentials were initiated) was unchanged by AMPMT. AMPMT (5 x 10-4 M), when applied to desheathed frog sciatic nerve trunks, had no detectable effect on the wave-form of the compound action potential and no change in conduction velocity was produced. AMPMT (5 x 10-4 M) reduced the sensitivity of the postjunctional membrane to applied acetylcholine six- to eight-fold. The neuromuscular blocking action of AMPMT is largely explainable on the basis of this inhibitor action at the postjunctional membrane. AMPMT at first weakly antagonizes and then potentiates a neuromuscular block produced by d-tubocurarine. In producing a neuromuscular block, AMPMT is 350 to 400 times less potent than d-tubocurarine. Thus AMPMT would seem to have little value as a muscular relaxant in anesthesiologic practice.

Submitted on May 23, 1966
Accepted on June 29, 1966







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1966 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.