JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gebber, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Volle, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gebber, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Volle, R. L.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 154, Issue 3, 410-417, 1966
Copyright © 1966 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN DRUG-EVOKED POTENTIALS AND TRANSMISSION IN A SYMPATHETIC GANGLION

Gerard L. Gebber 1 and Robert L. Volle 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana

A study was made of the effects of N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) on transmission, neurogenically evoked synaptic potential, drug-induced surface potentials and drug-induced firing in the superior cervical ganglion of the cat. Whereas a small dose of NEM enhanced the ganglionic action potential, the synaptic potential and the firing produced by acetylcholine (ACh) or tetramethylammonium chloride (TMA), it depressed the depolarization evoked by ACh or TMA and the hyperpolarization evoked by methacholine and norepinephrine. Moreover, NEM antagonized the block of transmission produced by ACh, TMA, methacholine and norepinephrine. The latter findings indicate that NEM stabilized the ganglion cells insofar as drug-induced surface potentials are concerned. The opposite actions of NEM on the synaptic potential and drug-induced depolarization can be explained by postulating 1) that NEM promoted an increase in ACh release from the nerve terminals in amounts adequate to overcome depression by NEM of the ganglion cell, 2) that injected ACh had ganglionic actions different from those of endogenous ACh or 3) that the depolarization of the ganglia evoked by ACh arose from extrajunctional cholinoceptive sites. The depression of ACh-induced depolarization at a time when firing was enhanced suggests a differential effect of NEM on the chemosensitive and spike-generating sites within the ganglion cells.

Submitted on June 13, 1966
Accepted on July 26, 1966







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1966 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.