JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Winder, C. V.
Right arrow Articles by Kaump, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Winder, C. V.
Right arrow Articles by Kaump, D. H.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 154, Issue 1, 161-175, 1966
Copyright © 1966 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


PHARMACOLOGIC AND TOXICOLOGIC STUDIES OF m-(1-METHYL-3-PROPYL-3-PYRROLIDINYL)PHENOL (CI-572), AN ANALGETIC AND ANTITUSSIVE AGENT

C. V. Winder 1, M. Welford 1, J. Wax 1, and D. H. Kaump 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, Research Division, Parke, Davis & Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan

CI-572 has a considerably greater, nalorphine-antagonized antinociceptive activity in rats (2.5-4 times codeine or meperidine) than prodilidine, and, unlike prodilidine, has a corresponding antitussive activity in dogs with ammonia-induced cough. Yet, like prodilidune, it fails to alleviate morphine abstinence signs in monkeys. It resembles prodilidine in lacking antiultraviolet erythema action in guinea pigs and antipyretic action in rats. It equals or exceeds prodilidune as an excitant in toxic doses in rodents and monkeys. It differs from prodilidine because it raises body temperature in rats and because it is transiently constipating in rats. Its l-isomer is twice as potent and toxic as the d-isomer. CI-572 is somewhat less potent orally than subcutaneously when compared with codeine or meperidine, whereas prodilidine is more effective orally than subcutaneously. The ratio of potency to acute sublethal or lethal toxicity in rats was generally higher with CI-5fl than with codeine or meperidine. Subacute oral toxicologic studies in rats, dogs and monkeys indicated that organic pathology occurred only at daily dose levels which exceeded those zig-naling neuromotor discomfort several times.

Submitted on January 1, 1966
Accepted on April 28, 1966







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1966 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.