JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NGAI, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by BOLME, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by NGAI, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by BOLME, P.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 153, Issue 3, 495-504, 1966
Copyright © 1966 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


EFFECTS OF ANESTHETICS ON CIRCULATORY REGULATORY MECHANISMS IN THE DOG

S. H. NGAI 1 and PER BOLME 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Effects of cyclopropane, halothane, enibomal sodium (a fast acting barbiturate) and morphine on circulatory regulating mechanisms were studied in dogs. The heart rate, arterial pressure, blood flow to the hind limb and their responses to stimulation of the hypothalamic or mesencephalic vasoactive areas and to common carotid occlusion were measured during the conscious state and during anesthesia or sedation with these drugs. During light cyclopropane anesthesia, the arterial pressure rose. Vascular resistance in the hind limb increased. As anesthesia was deepened, the heart rate decreased. Changes in the arterial pressure were inconsistent. With halothane anesthesia, there was bradycardia and progressive hypotension. After administration of enibomal, tachycardia and hypotension occurred. Sedation with morphine was accompanied by bradycardia but no significant change in the arterial pressure. Cyclopropane, halothaneand enibomal depressed the pressor response to central stimulation and carotid occlusion in proportion to the depth of anesthesia. The sympathetic cholinergic vasodilator response was unimpaired except during enibomal and deep cyclopropane anesthesia. Morphine did not appear to affect circulatory responses to central stimulation and carotid occlusion. These results suggest that the excitatory vasomotor mechanisms (adrenergic) are depressed during anesthesia. The basis for the hypertension and other evidences of sympathetic activation observed during cyclopropane anesthesia remains to be determined.

Submitted on October 6, 1965
Accepted on March 24, 1966







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1966 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.