JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laties, V. G.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laties, V. G.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, B.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 152, Issue 3, 388-396, 1966
Copyright © 1966 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


INFLUENCE OF DRUGS ON BEHAVIOR CONTROLLED BY INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL STIMULI

Victor G. Laties 1 and Bernard Weiss 1

1 Departments of Radiation Biology and Biophysics, Pharmacology, and Brain Research, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York

Three pigeons were trained to peck an illuminated disk for a food reinforcer which was delivered according to a fixed interval (FI) schedule of reinforcement. Under one set of conditions, the stimulus projected on the disk remained constant during the 5-min FI. Under a second set of conditions, the symbol projected on the disk changed once per minute during the interval, thus providing the birds with a "clock." These two conditions were chosen to represent behavior controlled by internal and external stimuli respectively, and were presented to the bird in an irregular order. Greater changes in response distribution were produced by amphetamine, scopolamine and pentobarbital when no "clock" was available; with the added clock, the virds responded mostly near the end of the interval, and drug-induced changes in response rate were for the most part confined to the end of the interval. This confirms for these drugs the hypothesis that behavior largely controlled by externally based discriminative stimuli is more resistant to drugs than behavior controlled by internal stimuli. Chlorpromazine and promazine, however, did not display such a pronounced differential effect on response distribution.

Accepted on January 17, 1966




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
J. E. Barrett and J. Bergman
Peter B. Dews and Pharmacological Studies on Behavior
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2008; 326(3): 683 - 690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1966 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.