JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gebber, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Volle, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gebber, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Volle, R. L.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 152, Issue 1, 18-28, 1966
Copyright © 1966 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


MECHANISMS INVOLVED IN GANGLIONIC BLOCKADE INDUCED BY TETRAMETHYLAMMONIUM

Gerard L. Gebber 1 and Robert L. Volle 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Tetramethylammonium (TMA)-induced block of transmission in the superior cervical ganglion of the cat was characterized by a sequential pattern of 1) blockade associated with ganglionic depolarization (TMA-early block), 2) recovery from block during the falling phase of depolarization and 3) the reappearance of ganglionic blockade associated with ganglionic hyperpolarization (TMA-late block). That the late block of transmission produced by TMA differed from that evoked by hexamethonium was indicated by 1) a rise in the ganglion demarcation potential, 2) changes in the contour of the evoked ganglionic action potential consistent with hyperpolarization and 3) an increase in acetylcholine- (ACh-) induced depolarization at a time when postganglionic firing produced by ACh was suppressed. Both the hyperpolarization and late-occurring block produced by TMA were antagonized by repetitive preganglionic stimulation, pilocarpine, 2-diethoxyphosphenylthioethyldimethylamine acid oxalate (217A0) or ouabain. Ouabain also antagonized the positive afterpotential following a single ganglionic spike and posttetanic hyperpolarization, but had not effect on ganglionic blockade produced by hexamethonium, methacholine or epinephrine. Pilocarpine, 217A0 and tetanus slightly enhanced or had no effect on block occurring during TMA- induced depolarization. Ouabain usually did not alter TMA-induced early block and depolarization. The findings with ouabain suggest that the late block and hyperpolarization produced by TMA were caused by a mechanism similar to that responsible for the positive afterpotential following the ganglionic spike.

Accepted on November 1, 1965




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
B. Libet and H. Kobayashi
Generation of Adrenergic and Cholinergic Potentials in Sympathetic Ganglion Cells
Science, June 27, 1969; 164(3887): 1530 - 1532.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1966 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.