JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iorio, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by McIsaac, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iorio, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by McIsaac, R. J.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 151, Issue 3, 430-437, 1966
Copyright © 1966 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


COMPARISON OF THE STIMULATING EFFECTS OF NICOTINE, PILOCARPINE AND HISTAMINE ON THE SUPERIOR CERVICAL GANGLION OF THE CAT

Louis C. Iorio 1 and Robert J. McIsaac 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, State University of New York, School of Medicine, Buffalo, New York

The objectives of this study were to characterize and compare the effects of nicotine, pilocarpine and histamine on the superior cervical ganglion of the pithed cat by recording isometric contractions of the nictitating membrane evoked by injection of the agonists into the common carotid artery. The relationship between dose of histamine and pilocarpine and the duration of tachyphylaxis was determined. In subsequent experiments, sufficient time between doses was allowed to permit recovery from tachyphylaxis. Repetitive electrical stimulation of the preganglionic nerve markedly enhanced the ganglion-stimulating effects of pilocarpine and histamine. A method of systematic repetitive stimulation of the preganglionic nerve was developed, which maintained the ganglion in a relatively stable, sensitized state for prolonged periods of time. The slopes of the doseresponse curves and the maximum force obtained for nicotine, histamine and pilocarpine with sensitized ganglia were different. Hexamethonium, atropine and pyrilamine were specific surmountable antagonists of nicotine, pilocarpine and histamine, respectively. Because of the highly specific blocking effects of the antagonists, it is concluded that nicotine, pilocarpine and histamine act at different receptor sites on or in ganglion cells; hence, the sensitization following repetitive preganglionic nerve stimulation is probably due to alteration of the ganglion cells.

Accepted on October 14, 1965







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1966 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.