JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Swinyard, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Castellion, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Swinyard, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Castellion, A. W.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 151, Issue 3, 369-375, 1966
Copyright © 1966 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


ANTICONVULSANT PROPERTIES OF SOME BENZODIAZEPINES

Ewart A. Swinyard 1 and Alan W. Castellion 1

1 Departments of Pharmacology, University of Utah College of Pharmacy and College of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah

The anticonvulsant potencies (ED50) of chlordiazepoxide (Librium), diazepam (Valium) and 7 experimental benzodiazepines were determined in mice by the following 3 tests: maximal electroshock seizure pattern (MES) test, low-frequency electroshock seizure threshold (l.f. EST) test and pentylenetetrazol (Metrazol) seizure threshold (s.c. Met) test. In addition, the dose of eachdrug which produced overt evidence of neurotoxicity in 50% of animals (TD50) was determined andprotective indices (PI = TD50/ED50) were calculated. Three of the more potent agents (chlordiazepoxide; compound 5, 7-nitro-5-(2-chlorophenyl)-3H-1,4-benzodiazepine-2(1H)-one; and compound 7, 7-nitro-5-(2-fluoromethylphenyl)-3H-1,4-benzodiazepine-2(1H)-one) were compared with trimethadione for ability to abolish the tonic extensor component of maximal pentylenetetrazol seizures(MMS test). Intravenously administered chlordiazepoxide, compound 5 and trimethadione also werecompared for ability to elevate by 100% the intravenous pentylenetetrazol seizure threshold. Finally, the effects of chlordiazepoxide and compound 5 on synaptic transmission were investigated in unanesthetized spinal cats. On the basis of the results obtained, the following conclusions appear justified: 1) Except for compounds 5 and 7 by the MES test, all 9 benzodiazepines tested are effective by all 3 tests; however, compound 6 (7-nitro-1-methyl-5-(2-fluorphenyl)-3H-1,4-benzodiazepine-2(1H)-one) was effective by the l.f. EST test only in a dose greatly in exces of the TD50. Compounds 5 and 7 were ineffective by the MES test, but were remarkably active by the l.f. EST, s.c. Met and MMS tests. 2) Compound 1 (7-chloro-4,5-dihydro-5-phenyl-3H-1,4-benzodiazepine-2(1H)-one) has the highest PI by the MES test (8.4) and compound 5 has the highest PI by the l.f. EST (3081) and s.c. Met (7983) tests. 3) Compound 5, administered intravenously, was determined to be 4750 times more potent than trimethadione in elevating by 100% the threshold for seizures induced by the intravenous administration of pentylenetetrazol. 4) Although chlordiazepoxide and compound 5 had no significant effect on transmission of isolated impulses in monosynaptic and polysynaptic pathways or on posttetanic potentiation in unanesthetized spinal cats, both drugs decreased the response to repetitive stimulation. This depressant effect was abolished with appropriate doses of pentylenetetrazol. In view of the favorable profile of anticonvulsant action of compound 1 and the unique antipentylenetetrazol activity of compound 5, these, and possibly other henzodiazepines included in this study, appear worthy of cautious clinical trial in epilepsy.

Accepted on September 30, 1965




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol Res NursHome page
N. C. Tkacs and H. J. Thompson
From bedside to bench and back again: research issues in animal models of human disease.
Biol Res Nurs, July 1, 2006; 8(1): 78 - 88.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1966 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.