JPET Celsis microsomes equal better data

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maxwell, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Eckhardt, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maxwell, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Eckhardt, S. B.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 151, Issue 2, 253-261, 1966
Copyright © 1966 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


SOME FACTORS DETERMINING THE RESPONSE OF RABBIT AORTIC STRIPS TO dl-NOREPINEPHRINE-7-H3 HYDROCHLORIDE AND THE INFLUENCE OF COCAINE, GUANETHIDINE AND METHYLPHENIDATE ON THESE FACTORS

R. A. Maxwell 1, W. B. Wastila 1, and S. B. Eckhardt 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont

Some factors determining the contractile response of rabbit aortic strips to norepinephrine have been studied. Norepinephrine is taken up and bound as increasing, linear functions of time from concentrations of 2 x 10-8 M and 10-7 M norepinephrine. After the first 5 to 10 min of exposure the difference between the curve for total uptake and the curve for bound norepinephrine remains constant with time. This difference represents the diffusible fraction of the total uptake. The norepinephrine component of the diffusible fraction also does not change with time over a 30-min period; neither does the magnitude of contraction. The contractile response is an increasing, linear function of the diffusible norepinephrine over the steep part of the concentration-action curve, i.e., from 2 x 10-8 M to 10-7 M norepinephrine. Likewise, the response is an increasing, linear function of the rate of binding of norepinephrine over this concentration range. Cocaine produces a concentration-dependent reduction in total uptake, binding rate and in diffusible norepinephrine. Approximately 30% reduction in binding rate can be produced with cocaine, guanethidine and methylphenidate without an increase in response. In the range of 30 to 70% reduction in binding rate, the response to norepinephrine is an increasing function of the percent reduction in binding produced by these drugs. Cocaine and guanethidine can produce considerable additional increase in response without additional reduction in binding. A simple mathematical model is described which relates increase in response, reduction in binding rate and local low concentrations of norepinephrine at binding sites. The curves generated by this model which relate percent increase in response to percent reduction in binding rate do not closely resemble experimental curves relating these two parameters. It is concluded that decrease in the binding rate of norepinephrine may not be an important determinant of the supersensitivity produced by cocaine, guanethidine and methylphenidate in rabbit aortic strips. It is suggested that these drugs have an action in the smooth muscle cells which may account in large part for supersensitivity.

Accepted on September 13, 1965




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
FAKE JDRHome page
M.J. Deasy and V. Di Stefano
Effects of Local Anesthetics on Epinephrine- and Norepinephrine-Induced Contractions of Rabbit Aortic Strips
Journal of Dental Research, September 1, 1972; 51(5): 1388 - 1393.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1966 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.