JPET Celsis microsomes equal better data

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hadidian, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hadidian, Z.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 151, Issue 1, 59-65, 1966
Copyright © 1966 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


THE STIMULATION OF CANINE PROSTATIC SECRETION BY PILOCARPINE

Emil R. Smith 1, Vladimir Ilievski 1, and Zareh Hadidian 1

1 Mason Research Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts

The stimulation of prostatic secretion by pilocarpine was studied in unanesthetized, castrated, testosterone-treated dogs with surgically prepared fistulas which allowed the collection of prostatic fluid uncontaminated by urine. In these dogs the intravenous injection of pilocarpine stimulated prostatic secretion. Treatment of these dogs with atropine, hexamethonium or pronethalol decreased the volume of secretion. Treatment with Dibozane, phenoxybenzamine, reserpine, morphine or cocaine did not reduce the response. It is concluded that the stimulation of canine prostatic secretion by pilocarpine cannot be attributed entirely to a direct action upon the gland but must involve additional, indirect actions. The possibilities are discussed that pilocarpine might provoke prostatic secretion in part by liberating catecholamines which in turn stimulate secretion, in part by activating the preganglionic fibers to the sympathetic cholinergic secretory fibers innervating the gland, and in part by a direct action on the gland.

Accepted on August 18, 1965







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1966 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.