JPET Celsis microsomes equal better data

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Norton, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jewett, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Norton, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jewett, R. E.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 149, Issue 3, 301-310, 1965
Copyright © 1965 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


EFFECT OF DRUGS ON SPONTANEOUS SLOW POTENTIAL OSCILLATIONS OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX

Stata Norton 1 and Robert E. Jewett 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas

Using nonpolarizable electrodes and d.e. amplifiers, rhythmic oscillations of the steady potentials can be recorded from the cortex of conscious, unrestrained cats. These waves represent a continuous spectrum with the electro-encephalogram. Three main frequency groups are distinguishable: 8-12 cpm, 3-5 cpm and 0.5.5-1.5 cpm. Voltages of these waves range from 1100 to 600 µV. During activated sleep (low voltage, desynchronized EEG) there is a negative shift of 400-1000 µV.

Except for the 8-12 cpm waves, which were not quantified, all slow waves, including periodic shifts with activated sleep, were blocked by amphetamine and chlorpromazine but not by sedative doses of BW 58-271 or thiopental. Motor behavior in response to an environmental stimulus (handling the cats) was not depressed by amphetamine but was markedly reduced by chlorpromazine, BW 58-271 or thiopental. After amphetamine the EEG showed a continuous desynchronized, low voltage pattern when the cats were undisturbed, while following chlorpromazine the EEG stayed in a synchronized light sleep pattern.

Evidence that the origin of the cortical slow waves and shifts during sleep patterns may be either limbic or reticular is discussed. The clear difference between the effects of chlorpromazine and anesthetic agents tends to support the limbic control of activated sleep postulated by Jouvet and Jouvet (1963).

Accepted on April 20, 1965







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1965 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.