JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boyd, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Meritt, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boyd, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Meritt, D. A.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 149, Issue 1, 138-145, 1965
Copyright © 1965 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


EFFECTS OF THIOPENTAL AND A TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL DERIVATIVE ON AROUSAL AND RECRUITING IN THE CAT

E. S. Boyd 1 and D. A. Meritt 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, The University of Rochester, Rochester, New York

Thiopental, 2 mg/kg, and DMHP, 0.2 mg/kg, increased the threshold for EEG arousal in acute preparations, and for behavioral, as well as EEG, arousal in chronic preparations. Arousal was induced in all preparations by electrical stimulation of the reticular formation.

It is suggested that some responses following thiopental, such as cortical desynchronization from the drug and synchrony instead of asynchrony during stimulation, as well as occasional initial lowering of threshold for arousal by both thiopental and DMHP, may be explained on the basis of an ascending inhibitory reticular system.

An attempt to produce EEG and behavioral arousal by the selective circulation of thiopental to the pontomedullary region in chronically prepared animals was successful in only 2 of 8 preparations.

Thiopental, 5 to 10 mg/kg, and DMHP, 0.2 mg/kg, had no effect on the recruiting response.

Accepted on February 23, 1965




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
C. H. Hockman, R. G. Perrin, and H. Kalant
Electroencephalographic and Behavioral Alterations Produced by Dgr1-Tetrahydrocannabinol
Science, May 28, 1971; 172(3986): 968 - 970.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1965 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.