JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Winter, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Flataker, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Winter, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Flataker, L.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 148, Issue 3, 373-379, 1965
Copyright © 1965 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


NOCICEPTIVE THRESHOLDS AS AFFECTED BY PARENTERAL ADMINISTRATION OF IRRITANTS AND OF VARIOUS ANTINOCICEPTIVE DRUGS

Charles A. Winter 1 and Lars Flataker 1

1 Merck Institute for Therapeutic Research, West Point, Pennsylvania

When compounds are tested for analgesic activity, misleading results may be obtained if the drugs are injected intraperitoneally. Morphine is only half as potent by the i.p. route as when given subcutaneously in rats.

On the other hand, parenteral administration of a substance which produces irritation or inflammation may yield results which can be mistakenly interpreted as evidence that the injected compound is a centrally acting analgesic drug. For example, the reaction threshold to a tail pinch in rats was markedly increased by the injection of 0.1 ml of 3% formalin into the foot. or by the intraperitoneal injection of stearic acid or phenyiquinone. The effect of the fonnalin and morphine enhanced each other; the action of intraperitoneal irritants was found to be dose-related.

Indomethacin, aminopyrine, acetophenetidine, and mefenamic acid raised the reaction threshold to tail pinch when the drugs were administered intraperitoneally, but mefenamic acid was inactive orally, even in relatively high doses. In the yeast-inflamed foot analgesic assay, indomethacin, flufenamic acid, mefenamic acid and aspirin raised the threshold for response to pressure applied to the inflamed foot; indomethacin was the most potent of the group. None of these compounds increased the response threshold of the normal foot, in contrast to the action of morphine. There was no evidence that any of these nonnarcotic analgesics was effective by a different mechanism than the others.

Accepted on February 8, 1965




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
D. Le Bars, M. Gozariu, and S. W. Cadden
Animal Models of Nociception
Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2001; 53(4): 597 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1965 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.