JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, E. N.
Right arrow Articles by Fleischli, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, E. N.
Right arrow Articles by Fleischli, G.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Blood and Blood Disorders
*Paralysis
Hazardous Substances DB
*TUBOCURARINE
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 147, Issue 1, 120-129, 1965
Copyright © 1965 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


THE DISTRIBUTION AND FATE OF d-TUBOCURARINE

Ellis N. Cohen 1, Aldo Corbascio 1, and Gerald Fleischli 1

1 Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, and Department of Pharmacology, University of California Medical Center, San Francisco, California

The distribution and elimination of d-tubocurarine were investigated in 30 dogs at a minimal paralyzing dose and at a second higher concentration sufficient to produce saturation of depots. The concentration of d-tubocurarine in the muscle tissue closely paralleled that found in the plasma. At lower dose levels, the liver played little role in the distribution of d-tubocurarine, but with larger dosage the liver served as an important reservoir. The nephrectomized animal appeared to be able to reduce plasma concentrations of d-tubocurarine although the second phase of redistribution was slowed or eliminated. An additional study was undertaken to evaluate the protein binding of d-tubocurarine, and this was found to occur with each of the protein fractions examined. Data from these studies were analyzed with the help of a multicompartment analog model.

Accepted on September 29, 1964







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1965 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.