JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vaillant, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vaillant, G. E.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 146, Issue 3, 377-384, 1964
Copyright © 1964 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


A COMPARISON OF CHLORPROMAZINE AND IMIPRAMINE ON BEHAVIOR OF THE PIGEON

George E. Vaillant 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

The effects of chlorpromazine and imipramine upon pigeons were contrasted in a complex behavioral situation. The experimental situation involved two keys, red (FI) and blue (FR): the first response on the former was reinforced after the conclusion of a 300-second interval and on the latter each thirtieth response was reinforced. The schedule was programmed so that responding on the blue key was reinforced several consecutive times while responding on the red key had no consequences and then the situation was reversed several times each session. The result was to create two complex concurrent behaviors on the two keys. In low doses imipramine increased the rate of responding on both keys without interfering with the control that the schedule and the discriminative stimuli existing in the experiment exerted upon the pigeons' behavior. However, during the period that the red (FI) key was reinforced, chlorpromazine selectively suppressed responding characteristic of fixed interval behavior on the red (FI) key. During the same phase in the schedule chlorpromazine increased unreinforced responding on the blue (FR) key; overall rate remained unaffected. High doses of imipramine increased overall rate still further but otherwise exerted effects similar to chlorpromazine.

Low doses of methamphetamine, like imipramine, increased overall behavior. Under the same schedule pentobarbital had effects very similar to those of chlorpromazine and produced changes that may be interpreted as representing diminished stimulus control. The chief effect of scopolamine was to reduce overall responding.

Accepted on August 7, 1964




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
D. E. McMillan, L. S. Harris, J. M. Frankenheim, and J. S. Kennedy
l-Dgr9-trans-Tetrahydrocannabinol in Pigeons: Tolerance to the Behavioral Effects
Science, July 31, 1970; 169(3944): 501 - 503.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1964 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.