JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, W. H.
Right arrow Articles by Schulman, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, W. H.
Right arrow Articles by Schulman, M. P.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 146, Issue 1, 66-73, 1964
Copyright © 1964 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


EFFECTS OF AROMATIC AND NONAROMATIC MODEL COMPOUNDS AND DRUGS ON ENZYMIC ACTIVITIES

Wolfgang H. Vogel 1, Robert Snyder 1, and Martin P. Schulman 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

Purified alcohol-, glutamic- and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenases, catalase and carboxypeptidase B were inhibited by simple aromatic compounds; aromatic multi-ring compounds (naphthalene, 2-naphthol, 2-naphthalenesulfonic acid) inhibited invariably at lower concentrations than compounds containing one aromatic ring (benzene, phenol, benzenesulfonic acid). Saturated one-ring compounds (dioxane, cyclohexanol, cyclohexanone) did not impair enzymic activities. In all cases, inhibition was not related to functional groups but could be correlated with aromatic and/or planar properties of the inhibitor molecules. Purified carbonic anhydrase, peroxidase and carboxypeptidase A were not inhibited by any of the above compounds indicating that sensitivity to aromatic moieties was not a common property of all of the enzymes tested.

The same pattern of enzyme inhibition was obtained with a variety of aromatic and nonaromatic drugs, B vitamins and analogs (propylhexadrine, menthol, inositol, biotin, desthiobiotin and procaine, acetylsalicylic acid, sulfanilamide, pyridoxine, pyridoxamine, pyridoxal, desoxypyridoxine and dibucaine, chloroquine, quinacrine, chlorpromazine, 9-aminoacridine, folic acid, aminopterin, riboflavin). While carboxypeptidase A and peroxidase were not inhibited by any of these compounds, the enzymic activities of carboxypeptidase B and of catalase were abolished by compounds containing aromatic moieties.

Inhibition of the activities of canboxypeptidase B and catalase by aromatic compounds was instantaneous and reversible. Kinetic data were complex but essentially identical for all compounds. Since aromatic moieties were the sole common feature of the inhibitor molecules, aromatic properties may well have been responsible for inhibition.

Accepted on June 19, 1964







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1964 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.