JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bloom, F. E.
Right arrow Articles by Salmoiraghi, G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bloom, F. E.
Right arrow Articles by Salmoiraghi, G. C.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 146, Issue 1, 16-23, 1964
Copyright © 1964 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


ANALYSIS OF INDIVIDUAL RABBIT OLFACTORY BULB NEURON RESPONSES TO THE MICROELECTROPHORESIS OF ACETYLCHOLINE, NOREPINEPHRINE AND SEROTONIN SYNERGISTS AND ANTAGONISTS

F. E. Bloom 1, E. Costa 1, and G. C. Salmoiraghi 1

1 Clinical Neuropharmacology Research Center, National Institute of Mental Health, and Laboratory of Chemical Pharmacology, National Heart Institute, National Institutes of Health at Saint Elizabeths Hospital, Washington, D. C.

The reduction of spontaneous discharge rate of olfactory neurons by electrophoretic administrations of ACh, NE or 5-HT to individual nerve cells has been investigated in unanesthetized rabbits. Electrophoretic administration of dihydro-beta-erythroidine, atropine, hexamethonium and chlorisondamine to ACh-sensitive units, blocked their response to ACh. Physostigmine prolonged the duration of the ACh response. Dihydro-beta-erythroidine specifically blocked the effects of ACh, but not of NE or 5-HT administration. Both the ACh blocking agents and physostigmine temporarily suppressed discharge rate regardless of ACh responsiveness.

Electrophoretic administration of NE and 5-HT always resulted in slowing of the unit’s spontaneous discharge. Similar responses were seen after administration of tyramine and metaraminol. Dibenamine and phentolamine specifically blocked NE responses and did not interfere with the responses of 5-HT. LSD-25 and BOL-148 did interfere with responses to 5-HT, but never without prior or concurrent blockade of responses to NE. The spontaneous discharge rate was at times increased after the unit’s response to NE was blocked by Dibenamine.

The ability of ACh, NE or 5-HT to slow spontaneous discharge rate was qualitatively unchanged 4 hours after local administration or intravenous injections of reserpine or 7 to 11 days after intravenous injection of agr-MMT, suggesting that the amines are not dependent for their effect upon intact brain stores of NE, 5-HT or dopamine. In agr-MMT treated rabbits, the effect of tyramine was not apparent until after electrophoresis of NE.

Accepted on June 9, 1964







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1964 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.