JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bendixen, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Layer, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bendixen, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Layer, M. B.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 145, Issue 3, 299-306, 1964
Copyright © 1964 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


DOSE-DEPENDENT DIFFERENCES IN CATECHOLAMINE ACTION ON HEART AND PERIPHERY

H. H. Bendixen 1, P. F. Osgood 1, K. V. Hall 1, and M. B. Layer 1

1 Anesthesia Laboratory of the Harvard Medical School at the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Dose-response curves were made in 10 intact anesthetized dogs, following sympathetic and parasympathetic block, of epinephrine and norepinephrine effect upon left ventricular contractile force, cardiac rate, mean arterial blood pressure and mean aortic blood flow. From these measurements resistance, conductance, and indices of internal and external cardiac work were calculated.

The circulatory response to epinephrine and norepinephrine was found to change with increasing doses, reaching maximum effect upon the heart with significantly smaller doses than those needed to produce maximal peripheral effect. Small doses facilitated myocardial contractility and blood flow, which decreased with increasing doses. Large doses of epinephrine and norepinephrine favored the peripheral pressor effect and placed the heart at an increasing disadvantage. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed.

Accepted on June 9, 1964







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1964 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.