JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, W. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, W. W.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 145, Issue 1, 83-86, 1964
Copyright © 1964 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


A NONSYMPATHOMIMETIC EFFECT OF CYCLOPENTAMINE AND beta-MERCAPTOETHYLAMINE IN THE RABBIT ILEUM

J. L. Schmidt 1 and W. W. Fleming 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, West Virginia University Medical Center, Morgantown, West Virginia

Pretreatment of rabbits with reserpine did not alter the dose-response relationships of cyclopentamine and beta-mercaptoethylamine (MEA) in inhibiting the spontaneous activity of the isolated ileum. Previous work relating the structure of sympathomimetic amines to the effect of reserpine on sensitivity to the amines suggested that these two compounds might not be functioning as sympathomimetics in the ileum. This possibility was consistent with the fact that reserpine did not alter the dose-response curve of papaverine and was supported by the inability of adrenergic blockade to antagonize the effects of cyclopentamine and MEA in the ileum. Studies of the ability of cyclopentamnine, MEA, papaverine, atropine and tripelennamine to antagonize the stimulatory action of acetylcholine, histamine and barium on the ileum indicated that cyclopentamine and MEA were acting as nonspecific spasmolytics, similar to papaverine. Attention is called to the fact that this nonspecific spasmolytic action of cyclopentamine and MEA is only one facet of their complex pharmacodynamics.

Accepted on February 19, 1964







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1964 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.