JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenblum, W.
Right arrow Articles by Zweifach, B. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosenblum, W.
Right arrow Articles by Zweifach, B. W.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 145, Issue 1, 58-63, 1964
Copyright © 1964 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


THE EFFECT OF TRANQUILIZERS ON THE CONTRACTILE RESPONSE OF CEREBRAL ARTERIES

William Rosenblum 1 and Benjamin W. Zweifach 1

1 Departments of Pathology, Bellevue Hospital and New York University School of Medicine, New York, N. Y.

Phenothianines and reserpine prevent or reduce the pial artery constriction which otherwise folows local administration of BaCl2. Moreover, local application of procaine, atropine, guanethidine, histamine, methacholine, acetylcholine, and methysergide, all failed to prevent the reaction to BaCl2. On the other hand, the systemic administration of reserpine and phenothiazine did not influence the constrictor response to local BaCl2, although tranquilization was achieved. In addition, at least one vasoactive agent without the ability to influence behavior, nylidrin HCl, was tested in a previous study and found to inhibit the response to BaCl2. Thus, hypotheses relating tranquilization to altered cerebrovascular reactivity remain unproven. However, the striking influence of locally applied tranquilizers on the response of pial arteries is an important and heretofore unreported finding. It is suggested that these effects are representative of reserpine and phenothiazine action on smooth muscle in general. Further study of this interaction should shed light on the mechanism by which these tranquilizers affect a variety of electrically excitable structures, including the neuron.

Accepted on February 7, 1964




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
W. I. Rosenblum
Cerebral Microcirculation: a Review Emphasizing the Interrelationship of Local Blood Flow and Neuronal Function
Angiology, August 1, 1965; 16(8): 485 - 507.
[PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1964 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.