JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hardinge, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, D. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hardinge, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, D. I.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 145, Issue 1, 47-51, 1964
Copyright © 1964 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


THE EFFECT OF FORCED EXERCISE ON BODY TEMPERATURE AND AMPHETAMINE TOXICITY

Mervyn G. Hardinge 1 and Donald I. Peterson 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California

The rise in body temperature of isolated mice whose motor activity is increased by forced excersice is as great as that of aggregated animals and both are significantly greater (P [unknown] 001) than in nonexercised isolated animals receiving the same dose of amphetamine or in untreated mice forced to exercise. Thus hyperthermia, and the associated mortality in amphetamine poisoning in mice, appears to be due to a combination of increased motor activity and impaired temperature regulation.

Since the increase in toxicity of amphetamine in isolated mice forced to exercise is as great as that of aggregation, it is suggested that "aggregation effect" of amphetamine is primarily due to increase in body temperature caused by an increase in motor activity. The protection offered by chlorpromazine to aggregated mice is probably due both to diminished sensory perception which prevents increased motor activity, and to its hypothermic effect.

Accepted on March 11, 1964







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1964 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.