JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Esplin, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Zablocka, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Esplin, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Zablocka, B.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 143, Issue 2, 174-180, 1964
Copyright © 1964 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


PILOCARPINE BLOCKADE OF SPINAL INHIBITION IN CATS

Don W. Esplin 1 and Barbara Zablocka 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, University of Utah College of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah

The effects of pilocarpine (40 to 160 mg/kg) on evoked monosynaptic and polysynaptic potentials in spinal cats are generally similar to those of strychnine. Spontaneous ventral root discharges were invariably seen with 160 mg/kg of the drug, and larger doses produced prolonged asynchronous discharges and recurring waves of activity resembling those seen after strychnine. these effects of pilocarpine were not altered by administration of atropine in one-tenth of the pilocarpine dosage.

Pilocarpine blocks "direct," indirect, and recurrent inhibition. Recurrent inhibition was abolished by doses of the drug which did not affect Renshaw cell discharges. In the "direct" pathway pilocarpine blocked inhibition evoked by stimuli at intervals too short to activate complex interneuronal systems. This indicates that the drug interferes directly with inhibitory processes and not merely with transmission in systems whose function may be predominantly inhibitory.

The pattern of peripheral and central blocking actions of piocarpine, taken together with other pharmacological evidence, points to a cholinergic link in the transmission of inhibitory impulses.

Submitted on August 2, 1963
Accepted on October 11, 1963







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1964 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.