JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kerley, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kerley, T. L.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 135, Issue 2, 240-244, 1962
Copyright © 1962 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


STRAIN DIFFERENCE IN RESPONSE OF MICE TO d-AMPHETAMINE

Lawrence C. Weaver 1 and T. Lamar Kerley 1

1 Biomedical Research Department, Research Center, Pitman-Moore Company, Division of The Dow Chemical Company, Indianapolis, Indiana

A qualitative difference in response of various strains of aggregated mice to d-amphetamine was observed. Swiss-Webster mice exhibited the usual 8-fold or so difference in lethality to amphetamine between the isolated and aggregated situation. C57BL/6 mice exhibited a significant difference but was less than 2-fold. Unexpectedly, BDF1 and DBA/2 mice responded identically in the two situations. It was determined that the thresholds for pentylenetetrazol and for amphetamine were lowered for Swiss-Webster but not BDF1 mice in the aggregate situation.

Quantitative differences between Swiss-Webster and BDF1 mice were observed as determined by lethality determinations, anticonvulsant effects and alterations of hexobarbital sleep times. Such quantitative differences were not unexpected.

These results emphasize the need to specify in publications the strain of mice used in laboratory studies.

Submitted on July 26, 1961







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1962 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.