JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Irwin, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hein, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Irwin, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hein, M. M.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 134, Issue 1, 53-59, 1961
Copyright © 1961 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


THE ACTIVITY OF CERTAIN LYCORAMINE DERIVATIVES ON MUSCLE

Richard L. Irwin 1, Henry J. Smith III 1, and Manfred M. Hein 1

1 National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Blindness, National Institutes of Health, U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Bethesda, Maryland

The muscle potentiating activity of the dimethyl-carbamate of deoxy-demethyl-lycoramine methiodide (MCDL) and the hydrochloride of the same compound (HCDL) has been investigated. At molar equivalent doses MCDL produces a greater amount of muscle potentiation than neostigmine bromide. HCDL is more potent than physostigmine salicylate but has only one-fourth the activity of the methiodide.

As inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase the methiodide and the hydrochloride of this lycoramine derivative are of equal potency but are more active than neostigmine or physostigmine.

The dimethyl-carbamate of deoxy-demethyl-lycoramine methiodide is a more effective antagonist to d-tubocurarine than the hydrochloride and is at least as potent as neostigmine. The hydrochloride has nearly the same activity against d-tubocurarine blockade as physostigmine.

No correlation has been found between the ability of the hydrochloride and methiodide to inhibit acetylcholinesterase, to potentiate indirectly stimulated muscle, or to antagonize d-tubocurarine activity. The methiodide to hydrochloride ratio of these properties is about 1:1 for enzyme inhibition, 1:4 for muscle potentiation and 1:8 for the antagonism to d-tubocurarine.

Submitted on March 24, 1961







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1961 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.