JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chin, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Domino, E. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chin, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Domino, E. F.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 132, Issue 1, 74-86, 1961
Copyright © 1961 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


EFFECTS OF MORPHINE ON BRAIN POTENTIALS EVOKED BY STIMULATION OF THE TOOTH PULP OF THE DOG

Jane Heng Chin 1 and Edward F. Domino 2

1 Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
2 Department of Pharmacology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

The actions of morphine and nalorphine antagonism on tooth pulp primary and secondary afferent systems were determined in acute dogs. Morphine usually was given intravenously in doses of 2 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg. Nalorphine usually was given intravenously in doses of 1 mg/kg or 2.5 mg/kg.

Drug effects on the potentials in the primary afferent pathway were determined cortically in the contralateral coronal gyrus and in the brainstem in the contralateral nucleus ventralis posteromedialis and the medial lemniscus. In general, morphine did not depress the amplitude or the latency of the responses in this system.

The actions of morphine and nalorphine on the secondary tooth pulp afferent potentials were complex. The potentials evoked from the tooth were usually enhanced in the areas surrounding central grey, some of the diencephalic nuclei (nucleus centralis medialis, nucleus medialis dorsalis, nucleus lateralis posterior, and nucleus subparafascicularis), and in some of the medullary reticular areas, but occasionally were depressed, or in other animals were unaffected. The latencies of evoked responses in nucleus medialis dorsalis were prolonged in spite of an enhancement in amplitude. Frequently an early depression in amplitude of evoked potentials from the tooth within the first few minutes after intravenous administration of morphine was associated with a marked fall in arterial blood pressure. Upon return of the blood pressure toward normal within 25 minutes after morphine administration, a subsequent enhancement of the amplitude of the potential occurred. In general, nalorphine partially antagonized these effects of morphine.

In human subjects it was shown that single shock electrical stimulation above threshold intensity of the central incisors produced a transient painful sensation.

The actions of morphine on cortical primary responses evoked by stimulation of the sciatic nerve were inconsistent. In the majority of the animals morphine had no effect.

Morphine in doses of 0.2 to 2 mg/kg given intravenously produced a definite enhancement of cortical recruiting responses following electrical stimulation of various thalamic areas. Nalorphine partially antagonized these effects.

Nalorphine in doses of 0.25 to 2.5 mg/kg given intravenously frac12 to 1 hour following morphine produced a statistically significant increase in the mean arterial blood pressure above control values.

It is concluded that the neural mechanisms of morphine analgesia of tooth pulp pain are complex. It does not appear that a simple depression or blockade of single afferent impulses arising from the peripheral tooth pain receptors can explain the analgesic action of morphine. Its effects on the secondary pathways from the tooth pulp are variable. Either an occasional depression, no effect, or a definite enhancement of potentials was observed. It is of considerable theoretical interest that an enhancement of the evoked afferent responses was the predominant action of morphine.

Submitted on August 28, 1960







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1961 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.