JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maxwell, R. A
Right arrow Articles by Coombs, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maxwell, R. A
Right arrow Articles by Coombs, H.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 126, Issue 3, 250-257, 1959
Copyright © 1959 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


A COMPARISON OF SOME OF THE CARDIOVASCULAR ACTIONS OF METHYLPHENIDATE AND COCAINE

R. A Maxwell 1, A. J. Plummer 1, H. Povalski 1, F. Schneider 1, and H. Coombs 1

1 Research Department, CIBA Pharmaceutical Products Inc., Summit, New Jersey

Cocaine and methylplmenidate, which have been reported elsewhere to produce a differential effect on the actions of a series of pressor amines of time phenylalkyhamine type, have been shown to possess the capacity to negate the phentolamine- induced blockade of norepinephrine while not affecting the blockade induced by doses of Dibenamine producing completely irreversible blockade of norepinephrine. Experiments indicate that cocaine and methylphenidate do not produce a generalized release of endogenous catecholamines. As has been demonstrated for methylphenidate, cocaine antagonizes carotid occlusion reflex pressor responses when administered intravenously. As also reported for methylphmenidate, this blockade is not at the carotid sinus nor is a blocking effect of cocaine in the efferent sympathetic periphery demonstrable. It is concluded that as for methylphenidate, the blocking action of cocaine on carotid occlusion responses is centrally induced. These results are discussed in relation to certain cardiovascular effects of reserpine and hexahydro-1-azepinepro-pionamidoxime (Su-4029) and the suggestion is made that an important action of cocaine and methylphenidate may be occurring at the smooth muscle motor receptor site.

Submitted on February 6, 1959







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1959 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.