JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laffan, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Borison, H. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laffan, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Borison, H. L.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 121, Issue 4, 468-476, 1957
Copyright © 1957 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


EMETIC ACTION OF NICOTINE AND LOBELINE

Robert J. Laffan 1 and Herbert L. Borison 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, University of Utah College of Medicine, Salt Lake City

The emetic action of nicotine and lobeline was studied in cats and dogs. The minimum uniformly effective emetic doses were found to be 1.5 mgm./kgm. of i.m. nicotine bitartrate and 0.5 mgm./kgm. of i.m. lobeline sulfate for both species. In terms of alkaloid base, the emetic dose-response curves of the two drugs are almost identical. Sixty-eight cats and 17 dogs were used to establish the locus of emetic action of the alkaloids. In dogs, ablation of the medullary emetic chemoreceptor trigger zone (CT zone) sufficed for protection against the emetic effect of nicotine and lobeline. In cats, however, it was found that the alkaloids act at a peripheral locus as well as at the CT zone. Thus, in order to eliminate the vomiting response in cats, it became necessary to perform the combined procedures of spinal deafferentation, midcervical vagotomy, and CT-zone ablation. This combination was accomplished either by interrupting peripheral nerves directly, along with ablating the CT zone, or by making a broad medullary lesion which appeared to destroy concomitantly both the CT zone and centripetal emetic pathways. Antiemetic drug studies demonstrated that tetraethylammonium (TEA) was effective in preventing emesis in response to nicotine in both cats and dogs, but it was not effective against lobeline in dogs. Hexamethonium (C6) protected both species against nicotine and lobeline. Neither atropine nor chlorpromazine prevented the vomiting response.

Submitted on July 15, 1957




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
S. G Allan
Review article : Emesis in the patient with advanced cancer
Palliative Medicine, June 1, 1988; 2(2): 89 - 100.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1957 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.