JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hauty, G. T.
Right arrow Articles by Payne, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hauty, G. T.
Right arrow Articles by Payne, R. B.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 120, Issue 1, 33-37, 1957
Copyright © 1957 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


EFFECTS OF DEXTRO-AMPHETAMINE UPON JUDGMENT

G. T. Hauty 1 and R. B. Payne 1

1 School of Aviation Medicine, USAF, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas

Ninety-six male basic airmen volunteers were randomly assigned to the 24 combinations of experimental conditions given by 4 pharmacological treatments, d-amphetamine (5 mgm.) scopolamine (0.65 mgm.) plus diphenhydramine hydrochloride (50 mgm.), placebo and no drug; 3 task conditions which permitted variation in the difficulty of the task assigned to the subjects; and 2 standard referents which were expected to induce feelings of success and failure. One hour following administration of the appropriate drug, they were then required to learn a mirror vision task. Before beginning each of the 14 test trials, they were told their proficiency score attained on the test trial just completed, saw that score plotted against a referent curve which was represented as "the average score made by most people", and then were asked to estimate the proficiency score they expected to attain in the test trial about to be performed. The absolute and algebraic differences between the proficiency estimated and the proficiency actually attained were computed and these measures of estimation error, as well as measures of actual performance, were then analyzed.

d-Amphetamine sulfate (5 mgm.) and diphenhydramine hydrochloride (50 mgm.) plus scopolamine (0.65 mgm.) did not influence significantly the judiciousness with which estimations were normally made despite the imposition of experimental conditions designed to elicit or augment whatever adverse effects may be inherent in these pharmacological preparations. Also unaffected was the actual mirror vision performance.

The different conditions of task difficulty did effect significant differences in the error of estimation during the very beginning of the task and in mirror vision performance throughout the task.

The different standard referents did not produce significant differences in error of estimation but did effect significant differences in mirror vision performance during the early part of this task.

Submitted on December 3, 1956







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1957 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.