JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gesler, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hoppe, J. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gesler, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hoppe, J. O.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 118, Issue 4, 395-406, 1956
Copyright © 1956 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


3,6-BIS(3-DIETHYLAMINOPROPOXY) PYRIDAZINE BISMETHIODIDE, A LONG-ACTING NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING AGENT

H. M. Gesler 1 and James O. Hoppe 1

1 Pharmacology Section , Sterling-Winthrop Research Institute, Rensscler, New York

Studies on the mechanism of actions of Compoumsd V have revealed: 1) neuromuscular blockade following Compound V in the cat sciatic-gastrocnemius preparation is primarily dependent upon the fuequency of nerve stimulation and the blockade is neither the result of contraction fatigue nor the result of altered nerve conduction; 2) Compound V does not antagonize acetylcholine on the frog rectus abdominis preparations, but 3) it produces a flaccid paralysis in the pigeon; 4) its neuromuscular blocking effects are partially antagonized by neostigmine; 5) it reduces the response of the denervated and normal gactrocnemius of the cat to intraarterial acetyleholine, and 6) a short tetanus of the gastrocnemius of the cat blocked with Compound V is not sustained and is followed by a posttetanic potentiation; yet 7) it has weak excitatory effects on the frog rectus abdominis and the denervated cat gastroenemius, as well as an anticurare action in the cat nerve-muscle preparation.

It is concluded that Compound V has a mode of action different from that of either d-tubocurarine or decamethonium, although its site of action appears to be at the postjunctional membrane. As a working hypothesis a mechanism is suggested which provides an explanation for many of the unusual effects of Compound V at the myoneural junction.

Submitted on June 16, 1956







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1956 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.