JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haley, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by McCormick, W. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haley, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by McCormick, W. G.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 117, Issue 4, 406-413, 1956
Copyright © 1956 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


COMPARISON OF THE EFFECT OF ERGOTAMINE AND HYDERGINE ON MUSCLE AND SKIN BLOOD FLOW IN THE ANESTHETIZED DOG

Thomas J. Haley 1 and W. G. McCormick 1

1 Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of california at Los Angeles

Studies have been made of the effects produced on muscle and skin blood flow in the hind limb of the dog after intraarterial injection of ergotamine, Hydergine, epinephrine, norepinephrine and methacholine.

The ergot alkaloids had little or no effect on the dilator response to ischemia. After a reduction in response from the control values, the vasodilatation produced by methacholine remained relatively constant.

Ergotamine and Hydergine both had a two-fold effect on the peripheral vascular bed, causing either constriction or dilatation depending on the dose injected. Higher doses caused dilatation.

Ergotamine and Hydergine caused epinephrine reversal, norepinephrine blockade, epinephrine blockade and norepinephrine reversal in the skin. However, Hydergine did not reverse epinephrine in the muscle. This ineffectiveness of Hydergine was probably related to the potent dilator effect of Hydergine per se.

Submitted on March 26, 1956







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1956 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.