JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kalow, W.
Right arrow Articles by Maykut, M. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kalow, W.
Right arrow Articles by Maykut, M. O.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Blood and Blood Disorders
Hazardous Substances DB
*PROCAINE
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 116, Issue 4, 418-432, 1956
Copyright © 1956 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


THE INTERACTION BETWEEN CHOLINESTERASES AND A SERIES OF LOCAL ANESTHETICS

W. Kalow 1 and M. O. Maykut 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, University of Toronto

The interactions between two homologous series of procaine analogues and cholinesterases were investigated. The local anesthetics were esters of substituted benzoic acids ("Series 0" consisting of Win 2559, 3606, 3459 (Ravocaine), 3706 (Sympocaine), and 5303), and thio esters of substituted benzoic acids ("Series S" consisting of Win 3260, 3800, 5334, and 4510). Procaine and dibucaine served as controls. The preparations of esterase were purified human serum cholinesterase (pseudocholinesterase) and a suspension of guinea pig brain for acetylcholine esterase.

Serum cholinesterase hydrolysed the compounds of Series 0 at about half the rate that it destroyed procaine but hydrolysed the compounds of Series S at an extremely slow rate. Acetylcholine esterase did not hydrolyse any of the compounds investigated.

The enzymatic hydrolysis of the compounds of Series 0 and of procaine was inhibited by dibucaine.

All the local anesthetics were strong inhibitors of the hydrolysis of benzoylcholine by serum cholinesterase. Their inhibiting action occurred instantaneously. Physostigmine, neostigmine, Ro 2-0638, and TEPP inhibited serum cholinesterase only after some delay. Acetylcholine esterase was less inhibited by local anesthetics than serum cholinesterase.

Local anesthetic potency was strongly related to affinity for serum cholinesterase and less so to affinity for acetylcholine esterase. It is suggested that this relationship mirrors to some extent the combination of local anesthetics with cellular receptors capable of combining with acetylcholine. The strong but delayed action of the classical inhibitors is explained in the literature as due to the formation of a fairly stable complex consisting of esterase and a fragment of the inhibitor. It may be concluded that the classical inhibitors should not block very strongly a receptor protein unless this protein has cholinesterase activity. This restriction does not seem to exist for the local anesthetics since the fast inhibition of esterase by these drugs suggests that the intact molecule is responsible for their action.

Submitted on November 7, 1955







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1956 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.