JPET Celsis microsomes equal better data

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lasagna, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lasagna, L.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 111, Issue 1, 9-20, 1954
Copyright © 1954 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


A COMPARISON OF HYPNOTIC AGENTS

Louis Lasagna 1

1 The Anesthesia Laboratory of the Harvard Medical School at the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

1. The hypnotic effects of three agents (chloral hydrate, pentobarbital sodium, and methylparafynol) have been assessed in 268 ward patients on their first night in the hospital following admission for elective surgery. The experimental design employed the principles of placebo controls, "double blind" technique, concurrent comparison, randomization of subjects, and statistical treatment of data.

2. Chloral hydrate, in a dose of 1.0 gm., was satisfactory for the rapid induction of sleep but did not differ from a placebo in providing five hours of uninterrupted sleep. Doubling the dose apparently produced prolongation of effect.

3. Pentobarbital sodium, in a dose of 0.1 gm., appeared somewhat less effective in inducing sleep than 1.0 gm. of chloral hydrate. A dose of 0.2 gm. was satisfactory both in inducing sleep and in maintaining sleep for five or more hours.

4. The hypnotic effects of methylparafynol, in 0.5 and 1.0 gm. doses, were indistinguishable from those of a placebo.

5. The use of pentobarbital sodium was followed by "hangover" in a number of instances, whereas chloral hydrate seemed relatively free of such effect. Neither agent was responsible for severe gastrointestinal disturbances and the incidence of nausea was low.

6. It is suggested that a rational approach to the use of hypnotics requires the accumulation of data in controlled clinical trials such as the one described.

Submitted on November 16, 1953




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
J. E. HARRIS
PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY
Arch Ophthalmol, August 1, 1955; 54(2): 262 - 299.
[PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1954 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.