JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foldes, F. F.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Foldes, F. F.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, D. L.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 108, Issue 3, 330-335, 1953
Copyright © 1953 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


THE EFFECT OF PREINCUBATION ON THE INHIBITORY EFFECT OF NEOSTIGMINE AND DIMETHYLCARBAMATE OF (2-HYDROXY-5-PHENYLBENZYL) TRIMETHYLAMMONIUM BROMIDE (RO-2-683) ON THE ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS OF PROCAINE

Francis F. Foldes 1, Manuel H. Aven 1, and David L. Davis 1

1 Department of Anesthesia, Mercy Hospital and Section on Anesthesiology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa.

1. Preincubation of various concentrations of neostigmine and Ro 2-683 with plasma, markedly influenced their inhibitory effect on the enzymatic hydrolysis of procaine.

2. Preincubation for relatively short periods increased the inhibitory effect of identical concentrations of the same inhibitor.

3. The duration of preincubation necessary for optimal inhibition was shorter with Ro 2-683 than with neostigmine and shorter with the higher inhibitor concentrations than with the lower ones.

4. Only insignificant inhibition was observed when neostigmine and procaine were added simultaneously to the plasmas. Ro 2-683, in higher concentrations, afforded considerable protection against hydrolysis, even when it was added to the plasmas simultaneously with the substrate.

5. Incubation for 24 hours markedly decreased the inhibitory potency of both neostigmine and Ro 2-683, with the exception of the highest concentration.

6. The decrease of the inhibitory potency of neostigmine and Ro 2-683 is probably due to both enzymatic and alkaline hydrolysis of these agents.

Submitted on January 29, 1953







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1953 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.