JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lands, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Howard, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lands, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Howard, J. W.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 106, Issue 1, 65-76, 1952
Copyright © 1952 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF l-ARTERENOL, EPINEPHRINE AND ISOPROPYLARTERENOL ON THE HEART

A. M. Lands 1 and J. W. Howard 1

1 Pharmacology Section, Sterling-Winthrop Research lnslitvte, Rensselaer, New York

1. Epinephrine is more effective than l-arterenol in increasing the amplitude and rate of contraction in the perfused frog heart and the tortoise isolated sinoauricular preparation. With both substances changes in amplitude are induced more readily than changes in rate of contraction.

2. Epinephrine is less effective than l-arterenol when the isolated rabbit auricle or the perfused rabbit heart is used. Concentrations producing significant changes in rate are lower than those for changes in amplitude.

3. Isopropylarterenol is much more effective than either epinephrine or l-arterenol in producing increases in rate and amplitude of contraction in all preparations used in this investigation.

4. The results obtained suggest that these substances may act on a different receptor mechanism in producing changes in rate than that involved in producing changes in amplitude.

5. The stimulating agents used in this investigation have a critical concentration for the effects which they produce. Concentration can be varied widely on either side of this concentration without causing significant changes in rate or amplitude of contraction.

6. Epinephrine and l-arterenol increase the capacity of the rabbit auricle to follow an artificial pace-maker (electrical stimulus) only when present at relatively high concentrations. Isopropylarterenol is much more effective than the above drugs.

7. Epinephrine frequently and l-arterenol occasionally reduce the capacity of the isolated rabbit auricle to follow an artificial pace-maker. This effect is obtained with lower concentrations than those which increase the maximum driven rate. The concentrations of isopropylarterenol used in this investigation only increased the maximum driven rate during the 20 minute observation period.

Submitted on April 21, 1952




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
C. J. McGAFF, N. K. COHEN, and L. LEIGHT
Hemodynamic Effects of Isoproterenol in Complete Heart Block
Arch Intern Med, August 1, 1959; 104(2): 242 - 248.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1952 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.