JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meyers, F. H.
Right arrow Articles by Abreu, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meyers, F. H.
Right arrow Articles by Abreu, B. E.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 104, Issue 4, 387-395, 1952
Copyright © 1952 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


A COMPARISON OF THE CENTRAL AND PERIPHERAL EFFECTS OF ATROPINE, SCOPOLAMINE AND SOME SYNTHETIC ATROPINE-LIKE COMPOUNDS

Frederick H. Meyers 1 and Benedict E. Abreu 1

1 Division of Pharmacology, Medical Units, University of Tennessee, Memphis and Research Department, Pitman-Moore Company, Indianapolis

1. The potency of atropine, scopolamine and some synthetic atropine-like compounds in producing peripheral parasympatholytic and central nervous system effects is compared.

2. None of the synthetic compounds is equivalent to atropine in potency or duration of action, in inhibiting intestinal motility in vivo.

3. The synthetic compounds are much less effective than atropine in suppressing or abolishing the pupillary reaction to light, and are comparatively more active in producing such central nervous system effects as sedation, ataxia and skeletal muscle weakness.

4. Atropine and scopolamine are qualitatively similar in their central nervous system effects, when correction is made for parasympatholytic potency.

5. The data on central anti-acetylcholine action of such agents are scrutinized and it now appears that the evidence for such effects is circumstantial.

Submitted on December 10, 1951







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1952 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.