JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alles, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alles, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, C. H.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 104, Issue 3, 253-263, 1952
Copyright © 1952 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE PHARMACOLOGY OF CERTAIN CRYPTOPINE ALKALOIDS

Gordon A. Alles 1 and Charles H. Ellis 1

1 Laboratories of Gordon A. Alles, Ph.D., Pasadena, California

1. The cardiac inhibitory effects of cryptopine and protopine are similar to that of allocryptopine (agr-fagarine) on the isolated auricle. Berberine, a compound quite closely related in structure to the cryptopine alkaloids, is far less active in this respect. Amarin, papaverine and quinidine were comparatively valued.

2. Intravenous doses of 4 x 10-6 to 2 x 10-5 moles per kgm. of the cryptopine alkaloids cause moderate pressor effects, and larger doses cause depressor effects. The alkaloids were not notably different in causing these effects. In addition, all of these alkaloids in these doses were found to cause occasional cardiac arrhythmias and sensitization to epinephrine induction of cardiac arrhythmias. These latter effects were similar to the effects of amarin.

3. On the isolated heart the cryptopine alkaloids were active coronary dilators comparable to papaverine, protopine being somewhat the most active and as active as papaverine. Amarin was similarly active, and all compounds caused some reduction in cardiac amplitude or rate, or both, in the range of dosage required for coronary dilator activity.

4. On isolated ileum biphasic responses were noted, but. with concentrations in the range of 10-4 to 5 x 10-4 molal, contraction was the usual response and protopine appeared to be somewhat the most active. With repeated addition of compounds to the ileum relaxing or blocking effects became evident.

5. Acute lethal toxicity was not greatly different for the cryptopine alkaloids, but protopine was somewhat the least toxic. Berberine was distinctly more toxic and produced marked depression in contrast to the stimulation noted following the cryptopine alkaloids.

Submitted on August 27, 1951







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1952 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.