JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harris, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Blockus, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harris, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Blockus, L. E.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 104, Issue 2, 135-148, 1952
Copyright © 1952 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF TOOTH PULP ALGESIMETRY

Stanley C. Harris 1 and Leo E. Blockus 1

1 Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Northwestern University Dental School, Chicago, Illinois

An effort has been made to evaluate quantitatively the reliability and validity of electrical excitation of the human tooth pulp as an algesimetric method.

Mechanical variations were rigorously controlled and the influence of suggestion was carefully evaluated and found to he significant after oral medication.

Evidence of reliability was obtained by finding that a) no significant differences occurred between the thresholds of experimentally induced pain when measured in 28 teeth, three times in immediate succession; and b) when 2 teeth were studied in each of 9 men, the changes in threshold which occurred after injection of 65 mgm. of codeine correlated very significantly in 4 of the subjects. The stability of the threshold was studied and found to decline significantly over two-hour's time.

The effects of A. P. C. and aspirin, 0.63 gm. each, orally, did not differ from each other or from the effects of placebos, though all three elevated the threshold significantly.

The validity of the method is partially attested by finding that 65 mgm. of codeine significantly elevated the threshold above the average pre-medication level, above the average threshold when no treatment is given and above the average threshold after placebos.

Submitted on September 24, 1951







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1952 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.